<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] polling -- picking up the pieces
- To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] polling -- picking up the pieces
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:00:17 -0500
oh well...
i, as the charter member of the O'Connor Foundation for Continuous Polling
(OFoCoPo for short) yield and cry "uncle"...
i would like to see a definition, from the group, as to what constitutes an
acceptable process to determine who supports which proposals. i think
releasing a report without that tally pretty dramatically reduces the
credibility of our report and strains the limits of transparency.
it's clear that the current poll doesn't stand a chance of getting through all
of your objections.
so. how do we get that done? my preference would be if you would point to a
process that's been done in some other Working Group and say "do it like that"
so i could set the staff folks on the task of getting something set up in time
for it to be completed by the time we release the Final Report.
thanks,
mikey
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|