RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Jeff's revision. Phil's typo fix is fine, but I don't think
Jon's change is necessary. It isn't any more accurate and including
details like that actually distracts from the main point.

Tim 
 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 6:28 am
To: Phil Buckingham <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>

Phil:

Thanks for pointing out that sentence. I made one suggested change to it
as well in the attached. Agree with the rest of Jeff's changes.

Thanks.

Jon



On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Phil Buckingham wrote:

> Jeff,
> 
> As ever, well drafted . To the outsider , maybe a new applicant , it is 
> factual and objective . If they , or indeed the Board members, want to delve 
> deeper it is sufficiently cross referenced , to enable them to draw their own 
> conclusions. Pleased that "all advocacy" has been removed.
> 
> I think there is a minor typo " Version 2 that included minimal restrictions 
> on vertical integration in the form ( insert - of a ) new gTLD registry 
> agreement " .
> 
> regards
> 
> Phil Buckingham
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Neuman, Jeff
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:41 PM
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
> 
> All,
> 
> Based on today’s discussion and the agreement to remove Section 4 of the 
> Initial report, I have drafted some language that we can include in Section 
> 2.2 to discuss Salop and Wright. On the call we discussed not having the 
> report as an Annex, but rather just linking to it.
> 
> I would like for everyone to review to make sure that they are comfortable 
> with what I have drafted. I believe it is objective and takes out all of the 
> advocacy. That said, I wrote it so of course I feel this way.
> 
> I am particularly interested in feedback from Avri, as I believe this is the 
> reason for her protest and wanting a Minority Report.
> 
> P.S., I took the text from the Wiki, put it in Word and therefore was not 
> able to get the footnotes right. 
> 
> Let me know your thoughts.
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
>