Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 Ken Stubbs wrote:
I am in agreement with Tim here

On 7/20/2010 9:51 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> I agree with Jeff's revision. Phil's typo fix is fine, but I don't think
> Jon's change is necessary. It isn't any more accurate and including
> details like that actually distracts from the main point.
>
> Tim
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
> From: Jon Nevett<jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 6:28 am
> To: Phil Buckingham<pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Neuman, Jeff"<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Phil:
>
> Thanks for pointing out that sentence. I made one suggested change to it
> as well in the attached. Agree with the rest of Jeff's changes.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Phil Buckingham wrote:
>
> > Jeff,
> >
> > As ever, well drafted . To the outsider , maybe a new applicant , it is factual and 
> > objective . If they , or indeed the Board members, want to delve deeper it is 
> > sufficiently cross referenced , to enable them to draw their own conclusions. Pleased 
> > that "all advocacy" has been removed.
> >
> > I think there is a minor typo " Version 2 that included minimal restrictions on 
> > vertical integration in the form ( insert - of a ) new gTLD registry agreement " .
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Phil Buckingham
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Neuman, Jeff
> > To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:41 PM
> > Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Based on today’s discussion and the agreement to remove Section 4 of the 
> > Initial report, I have drafted some language that we can include in Section 2.2 to 
> > discuss Salop and Wright. On the call we discussed not having the report as an Annex, 
> > but rather just linking to it.
> >
> > I would like for everyone to review to make sure that they are comfortable with 
> > what I have drafted. I believe it is objective and takes out all of the 
> > advocacy. That said, I wrote it so of course I feel this way.
> >
> > I am particularly interested in feedback from Avri, as I believe this is the 
> > reason for her protest and wanting a Minority Report.
> >
> > P.S., I took the text from the Wiki, put it in Word and therefore was not able 
> > to get the footnotes right.
> >
> > Let me know your thoughts.
> >
> > Jeffrey J. Neuman
> > Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law&  Policy
> > 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> > Office: +1.571.434.5772 Mobile: +1.202.549.5079 Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> > jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx / www.neustar.biz
> > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> > of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
> > information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
> > e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
> > of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
> > in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.