RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

How about *certain restrictions* with the footnote you suggest?

Tim 
 
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 9:23 am
To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman,Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx, Phil Buckingham <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Was that a typo? Did you mean Nevett Crap :-)?

On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> Personally I prefer the 100k number to be present so that the public comments 
> will be informed at least in the coarse form of the kinds of policy ideas 
> considered, here, in DAGv2, a kind of volume cap (which no one has seen since 
> 2001, and only an sTLD).
> 
> I propose we call it "the Nevett Cap", as Jon proposed it off of a scrap of 
> paper at the December 2008 meeting at Wilmer-Hale, and his name should go up 
> in bright lights when DAGv2 is on stage. ;-)
> 
> Eric