Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2

[Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Tim:  Fine by me.  Thanks.  Jon


On Jul 20, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> 
> How about *certain restrictions* with the footnote you suggest?
> 
> Tim 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
> From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 9:23 am
> To: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman,Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx, Phil Buckingham <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Was that a typo? Did you mean Nevett Crap :-)?
> 
> On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> 
>> Personally I prefer the 100k number to be present so that the public 
>> comments will be informed at least in the coarse form of the kinds of policy 
>> ideas considered, here, in DAGv2, a kind of volume cap (which no one has 
>> seen since 2001, and only an sTLD).
>> 
>> I propose we call it "the Nevett Cap", as Jon proposed it off of a scrap of 
>> paper at the December 2008 meeting at Wilmer-Hale, and his name should go up 
>> in bright lights when DAGv2 is on stage. ;-)
>> 
>> Eric
> 
>