How about *certain restrictions* with the footnote you suggest?
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Salop and Wright - Edits to Section 2.2
From: Jon Nevett<jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, July 20, 2010 9:23 am
To: Eric Brunner-Williams<ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Tim Ruiz<tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Neuman,Jeff"<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>,
Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx, Phil Buckingham<pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Was that a typo? Did you mean Nevett Crap :-)?
On Jul 20, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
Personally I prefer the 100k number to be present so that the public comments
will be informed at least in the coarse form of the kinds of policy ideas
considered, here, in DAGv2, a kind of volume cap (which no one has seen since
2001, and only an sTLD).
I propose we call it "the Nevett Cap", as Jon proposed it off of a scrap of
paper at the December 2008 meeting at Wilmer-Hale, and his name should go up in bright
lights when DAGv2 is on stage. ;-)
Eric