RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

["Kathy Kleiman" <kKleiman@xxxxxxx>]

I just wish that our 2 columns of signatures could have been preserved
into the final version (that would take much  less space).

Best,

 

Kathy Kleiman

Director of Policy

.ORG The Public Interest Registry

Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846

 

Visit us online!

Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz! <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz> 

Find us on Facebook | dotorg
<http://www.facebook.com/pages/dotorg/203294399456?v=wall> 

See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz> 

See our video library on YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz> 

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:

Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If
received in error, please inform sender and then delete.

 

 

 

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:24 PM
To: Phil Buckingham; owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; Sivasubramanian M
Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; Mike O'Connor
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

 

RACK included signatories. Others chose not to. It has been out that way
for momths. They are part of the proposal. Removing them is NOT an
option unless we're allowed to start editing the proposals as well.

If anything in RACK is changed or there is any other major change to the
report, it should NOT be posted for at least 72 hrs to allow review.

Tim

________________________________

From: "Phil Buckingham" <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

Sender: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 

Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:19:44 +0100

To: Sivasubramanian M<isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>

Cc: <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>; Mike O'Connor<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

 

Sivasubramanian,

 

Good spot- now on page 81 (?)  . Must be consistent across all proposals
. This list of supporters MUST be deleted. There must be no indication
of any form of  "conflict of interest" between Board members and VI WG
members.

I think I should leave it at that !

 

regards

 

Phil 

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Sivasubramanian M <mailto:isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>  

        To: Mike O'Connor <mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>  

        Cc: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx 

        Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:24 PM

        Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

         

        Mike,

         

        This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals
as featured in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of
supporters which was possibly a section that the Rack + draft included
to list co-proposers. But in the draft report, Rack + happens to be the
only proposal that shows a list of supporters. Outsiders may get the
impression (on a rapid glance) that Rack + is the 'most supported'
proposal, in the absence of a similar list of supporters in the other
proposals. So this part of the Rack + proposal may please be deleted. 

         

         

        Sivasubramanian M
        
        
        
        

        On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

        
        again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just
had an intense storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have
a road to drive on.
        
        i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to
see a way forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.
        
        looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.
Jeff, stir yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.
        
        thanks,
        
        mikey
        
        
        - - - - - - - - -
        phone   651-647-6109
        fax             866-280-2356
        web     http://www.haven2.com
        handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
Google, etc.)