Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items

[Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>]

A way out would be to include a short section titled "flow of proposals"
which would say:

Proposal N <link> by A, B
became
Proposal N+ <link> by A, B and D
which merged with
Proposal X <link> by E, F and G

which is now called Proposal NX <link>


Supporters:  ( refer poll summary )

Sivasubramanian M


Sivasubramanian M
http://turiya.co.in

http://www.isocmadras.com
facebook: http://is.gd/x8Sh
LinkedIn: http://is.gd/x8U6
Twitter: http://is.gd/x8Vz




On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kKleiman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>  I just wish that our 2 columns of signatures could have been preserved
> into the final version (that would take much  less space).
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> *Kathy Kleiman*
>
> *Director of Policy***
>
> *.ORG The Public Interest Registry*
>
> *Direct: +1 703 889-5756  Mobile: +1 703 371-6846*
>
> * *
>
> *Visit us online!*
>
> Check out events & blogs at .ORG Buzz! <http://www.pir.org/orgbuzz>
>
> Find us on Facebook | 
> dotorg<http://www.facebook.com/pages/dotorg/203294399456?v=wall>
>
> See the .ORG Buzz! Photo Gallery on Flickr <http://flickr.com/orgbuzz>
>
> See our video library on YouTube <http://youtube.com/orgbuzz>
>
>
>
> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:***
>
> Proprietary and confidential to .ORG, The Public Interest Registry.  If
> received in error, please inform sender and then delete.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 22, 2010 3:24 PM
> *To:* Phil Buckingham; owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; Sivasubramanian M
>
> *Cc:* Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; Mike O'Connor
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
>
>
> RACK included signatories. Others chose not to. It has been out that way
> for momths. They are part of the proposal. Removing them is NOT an option
> unless we're allowed to start editing the proposals as well.
>
> If anything in RACK is changed or there is any other major change to the
> report, it should NOT be posted for at least 72 hrs to allow review.
>
> Tim
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Phil Buckingham" <pjbuckingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Sender: *owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>
> *Date: *Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:19:44 +0100
>
> *To: *Sivasubramanian M<isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Cc: *<Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>; Mike O'Connor<mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
>
>
> Sivasubramanian,
>
>
>
> Good spot- now on page 81 (?)  . Must be consistent across all proposals .
> This list of supporters MUST be deleted. There must be no indication of any
> form of  "conflict of interest" between Board members and VI WG members.
>
> I think I should leave it at that !
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> *To:* Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> *Cc:* Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 22, 2010 5:24 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] a couple last items
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
>
>
> This is just a point about uniformity of the format of proposals as
> featured in the draft report.  On page 78, Rack + shows a list of supporters
> which was possibly a section that the Rack + draft included to list
> co-proposers. But in the draft report, Rack + happens to be the only
> proposal that shows a list of supporters. Outsiders may get the impression
> (on a rapid glance) that Rack + is the 'most supported' proposal, in the
> absence of a similar list of supporters in the other proposals. So this part
> of the Rack + proposal may please be deleted.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sivasubramanian M
>
>
>
>  On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> again, sorry if this is "too much information" but we've just had an
> intense storm run through here.  i need to go see if i still have a road to
> drive on.
>
> i'm hoping a) to be back on the air in about an hour and b) to see a way
> forward on those two remaining issues when i get back.
>
> looks like we're seeing some conversation on Antony's thread.  Jeff, stir
> yourself one last time and help us get your issue closed.
>
> thanks,
>
> mikey
>
>
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone   651-647-6109
> fax             866-280-2356
> web     http://www.haven2.com
> handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)
>
>
>
>