<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- To: Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:56:57 -0500
hi Antony,
i was pondering that too.
it seems to me that we're transitioning from Part 1 of our work to Part 2. i
think this is a good thing, by the way.
in Part 1, we were basically given a really harsh deadline under which to
conduct a negotiation. there wasn't time to conduct any research or analysis,
we basically had to take our positions and smack them together to see if there
was a path that equally disagreeable to all. unsurprisingly, we didn't find
that path.
in Part 2, we have the luxury of taking a bit more methodical look at things
and see if we can figure out A Better Way. and that is, i think, what we're
starting to do with this thread about harms.
i'd like to try out an idea and see whether i get shot out of the saddle...
-- first, figure out what the problem is (i think the list of harms falls into
the "define the problem" step)
-- then, figure out what the possible solutions are (separation, compliance,
exceptions, etc.)
-- then, figure out which possible solutions will most effectively solve the
problems
so, while i agree that eventually we're going to have to cover the bases of
compliance and enforcement, i'm pretty comfortable just documenting the harms
as a first step. whatcha think?
mikey
On Jul 27, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> Shouldn't this be the harms and compliance/enforcement group? Seems silly to
> consider them separately.
>
> On Jul 27, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> here's my starter-list of harms, collected mostly from the background
>> documents on our wiki. i could have sworn i went back and started
>> documenting where each of these were described, but i sure can't find the
>> draft i think i started. so here's the raw list. i'll keep hunting for the
>> draft i started and i'll push it along if i find it.
>>
>> mikey
>>
>>
>> <VI - Harms.pdf>
>>
>> <VI - Harms.doc>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:43 PM, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>>
>>> As discussed on the call, I would like to move ahead with a group,
>>> sub-group or whatever formation we decide to document and explore the
>>> “harms” that have been discussed throughout the VI discussions. The harms
>>> that will come to consumers has been the reason some have opposed any sort
>>> of integration, yet we still do not have a definitive list of these harms
>>> and how they will occur, if they are actual harms or if they have anything
>>> to do with integration. I know there have been a few links sent around and
>>> side discussions, but I think that now that the Initial Report has been
>>> submitted, we have time to actually work on this project and complete a
>>> formal list.
>>>
>>> I see the discussion moving into two main areas. Harms from having
>>> integration and harms from not having integration. I think that once we
>>> have established each , we may be able to apply those to each proposal.
>>> Once this is complete it can be included in the updated Initial Report and
>>> will most likely help the Board in their decision making process since they
>>> will be deciding on the positive and negative of different levels of
>>> integration.
>>>
>>> Maybe the best way to get this moving is to start a list below and people
>>> add their name.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Harms Team/Group
>>>
>>> Jeffrey Eckhaus
>>>
>>> Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may
>>> include privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand
>>> Media, Inc. Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other
>>> than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying
>>> to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
>>
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone 651-647-6109
>> fax 866-280-2356
>> web http://www.haven2.com
>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>> Google, etc.)
>>
>
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|