RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Same here.        


Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
> From: "Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, July 28, 2010 7:39 am
> To: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
>    Regardless of whether the
>    "harms" discussions take place
>    on the entire VI WG list or
>    contained within the
>    sub-group, I would like to be
>    "in."
> 
>    Statton
> 
>    From:
>    owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>    [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@ic
>    ann.org] On Behalf Of Richard
>    Tindal
>    Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010
>    2:58 PM
>    To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>    Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10]
>    Group on documenting "harms"
> 
>    Count me in
> 
>    RT
> 
>    On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM,
>    Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>    As discussed on the call, I
>    would like to move ahead with
>    a group, sub-group or whatever
>    formation we decide to
>    document and explore the
>    "harms" that have been
>    discussed throughout the VI
>    discussions. The harms that
>    will come to consumers has
>    been the reason some have
>    opposed any sort of
>    integration, yet we still do
>    not have a definitive list of
>    these harms and how they will
>    occur, if they are actual
>    harms or if they have anything
>    to do with integration.  I
>    know there have been a few
>    links sent around and side
>    discussions, but I think that
>    now that the Initial Report
>    has been submitted, we have
>    time to actually work on this
>    project and complete a formal
>    list.
> 
>    I see the discussion moving
>    into two main areas. Harms
>    from having integration and
>    harms from not having
>    integration. I think that once
>    we have established each , we
>    may be able to apply those to
>    each proposal. Once this is
>    complete it can be included in
>    the updated Initial Report and
>    will most likely help the
>    Board in their decision making
>    process since they will be
>    deciding on the positive and
>    negative of different levels
>    of integration.
> 
>    Maybe the best way to get this
>    moving is to start a list
>    below and people add their
>    name.
> 
> 
>    Harms Team/Group
> 
>    Jeffrey Eckhaus
>    ______________________________
>    Please NOTE: This electronic
>    message, including any
>    attachments, may include
>    privileged, confidential
>    and/or inside information
>    owned by Demand Media, Inc.
>    Any distribution or use of
>    this communication by anyone
>    other than the intended
>    recipient(s) is strictly
>    prohibited and may be
>    unlawful. If you are not the
>    intended recipient, please
>    notify the sender by replying
>    to this message and then
>    delete it from your system.
>    Thank you.