Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1

Stéphane

Envoyé de mon iPhone4

Le 28 juil. 2010 à 15:01, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Same here.        
> 
> 
> Tim
> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
>> From: "Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wed, July 28, 2010 7:39 am
>> To: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> 
>>   Regardless of whether the
>>   "harms" discussions take place
>>   on the entire VI WG list or
>>   contained within the
>>   sub-group, I would like to be
>>   "in."
>> 
>>   Statton
>> 
>>   From:
>>   owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>   [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@ic
>>   ann.org] On Behalf Of Richard
>>   Tindal
>>   Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010
>>   2:58 PM
>>   To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>   Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10]
>>   Group on documenting "harms"
>> 
>>   Count me in
>> 
>>   RT
>> 
>>   On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM,
>>   Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>>   As discussed on the call, I
>>   would like to move ahead with
>>   a group, sub-group or whatever
>>   formation we decide to
>>   document and explore the
>>   "harms" that have been
>>   discussed throughout the VI
>>   discussions. The harms that
>>   will come to consumers has
>>   been the reason some have
>>   opposed any sort of
>>   integration, yet we still do
>>   not have a definitive list of
>>   these harms and how they will
>>   occur, if they are actual
>>   harms or if they have anything
>>   to do with integration.  I
>>   know there have been a few
>>   links sent around and side
>>   discussions, but I think that
>>   now that the Initial Report
>>   has been submitted, we have
>>   time to actually work on this
>>   project and complete a formal
>>   list.
>> 
>>   I see the discussion moving
>>   into two main areas. Harms
>>   from having integration and
>>   harms from not having
>>   integration. I think that once
>>   we have established each , we
>>   may be able to apply those to
>>   each proposal. Once this is
>>   complete it can be included in
>>   the updated Initial Report and
>>   will most likely help the
>>   Board in their decision making
>>   process since they will be
>>   deciding on the positive and
>>   negative of different levels
>>   of integration.
>> 
>>   Maybe the best way to get this
>>   moving is to start a list
>>   below and people add their
>>   name.
>> 
>> 
>>   Harms Team/Group
>> 
>>   Jeffrey Eckhaus
>>   ______________________________
>>   Please NOTE: This electronic
>>   message, including any
>>   attachments, may include
>>   privileged, confidential
>>   and/or inside information
>>   owned by Demand Media, Inc.
>>   Any distribution or use of
>>   this communication by anyone
>>   other than the intended
>>   recipient(s) is strictly
>>   prohibited and may be
>>   unlawful. If you are not the
>>   intended recipient, please
>>   notify the sender by replying
>>   to this message and then
>>   delete it from your system.
>>   Thank you.
>