Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Jon. St this stage, looks like adding another sublist would be 
complicating matters further.

Stéphane

Envoyé de mon iPhone4

Le 28 juil. 2010 à 15:16, Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Me too. I think we have enough folks wanting in that we should keep it on the 
> main list. Thanks. Jon
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 28, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Same here.
>> 
>> 
>> Tim
>> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
>> 
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
>>> From: "Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Wed, July 28, 2010 7:39 am
>>> To: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Regardless of whether the
>>>  "harms" discussions take place
>>>  on the entire VI WG list or
>>>  contained within the
>>>  sub-group, I would like to be
>>>  "in."
>>> 
>>>  Statton
>>> 
>>>  From:
>>>  owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>>  [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@ic
>>>  ann.org] On Behalf Of Richard
>>>  Tindal
>>>  Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010
>>>  2:58 PM
>>>  To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
>>>  Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10]
>>>  Group on documenting "harms"
>>> 
>>>  Count me in
>>> 
>>>  RT
>>> 
>>>  On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM,
>>>  Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
>>>  As discussed on the call, I
>>>  would like to move ahead with
>>>  a group, sub-group or whatever
>>>  formation we decide to
>>>  document and explore the
>>>  "harms" that have been
>>>  discussed throughout the VI
>>>  discussions. The harms that
>>>  will come to consumers has
>>>  been the reason some have
>>>  opposed any sort of
>>>  integration, yet we still do
>>>  not have a definitive list of
>>>  these harms and how they will
>>>  occur, if they are actual
>>>  harms or if they have anything
>>>  to do with integration.  I
>>>  know there have been a few
>>>  links sent around and side
>>>  discussions, but I think that
>>>  now that the Initial Report
>>>  has been submitted, we have
>>>  time to actually work on this
>>>  project and complete a formal
>>>  list.
>>> 
>>>  I see the discussion moving
>>>  into two main areas. Harms
>>>  from having integration and
>>>  harms from not having
>>>  integration. I think that once
>>>  we have established each , we
>>>  may be able to apply those to
>>>  each proposal. Once this is
>>>  complete it can be included in
>>>  the updated Initial Report and
>>>  will most likely help the
>>>  Board in their decision making
>>>  process since they will be
>>>  deciding on the positive and
>>>  negative of different levels
>>>  of integration.
>>> 
>>>  Maybe the best way to get this
>>>  moving is to start a list
>>>  below and people add their
>>>  name.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Harms Team/Group
>>> 
>>>  Jeffrey Eckhaus
>>>  ______________________________
>>>  Please NOTE: This electronic
>>>  message, including any
>>>  attachments, may include
>>>  privileged, confidential
>>>  and/or inside information
>>>  owned by Demand Media, Inc.
>>>  Any distribution or use of
>>>  this communication by anyone
>>>  other than the intended
>>>  recipient(s) is strictly
>>>  prohibited and may be
>>>  unlawful. If you are not the
>>>  intended recipient, please
>>>  notify the sender by replying
>>>  to this message and then
>>>  delete it from your system.
>>>  Thank you.
>>