ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"

  • To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
  • From: Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:16:33 -0700


Me too. I think we have enough folks wanting in that we should keep it on the main list. Thanks. Jon



On Jul 28, 2010, at 6:01 AM, Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Same here.


Tim
Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms"
From: "Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, July 28, 2010 7:39 am
To: "Richard Tindal" <richardtindal@xxxxxx>, <Gnso-vi- feb10@xxxxxxxxx>


  Regardless of whether the
  "harms" discussions take place
  on the entire VI WG list or
  contained within the
  sub-group, I would like to be
  "in."

  Statton

  From:
  owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@ic
  ann.org] On Behalf Of Richard
  Tindal
  Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010
  2:58 PM
  To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
  Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10]
  Group on documenting "harms"

  Count me in

  RT

  On Jul 26, 2010, at 11:43 AM,
  Jeff Eckhaus wrote:
  As discussed on the call, I
  would like to move ahead with
  a group, sub-group or whatever
  formation we decide to
  document and explore the
  "harms" that have been
  discussed throughout the VI
  discussions. The harms that
  will come to consumers has
  been the reason some have
  opposed any sort of
  integration, yet we still do
  not have a definitive list of
  these harms and how they will
  occur, if they are actual
  harms or if they have anything
  to do with integration.  I
  know there have been a few
  links sent around and side
  discussions, but I think that
  now that the Initial Report
  has been submitted, we have
  time to actually work on this
  project and complete a formal
  list.

  I see the discussion moving
  into two main areas. Harms
  from having integration and
  harms from not having
  integration. I think that once
  we have established each , we
  may be able to apply those to
  each proposal. Once this is
  complete it can be included in
  the updated Initial Report and
  will most likely help the
  Board in their decision making
  process since they will be
  deciding on the positive and
  negative of different levels
  of integration.

  Maybe the best way to get this
  moving is to start a list
  below and people add their
  name.


  Harms Team/Group

  Jeffrey Eckhaus
  ______________________________
  Please NOTE: This electronic
  message, including any
  attachments, may include
  privileged, confidential
  and/or inside information
  owned by Demand Media, Inc.
  Any distribution or use of
  this communication by anyone
  other than the intended
  recipient(s) is strictly
  prohibited and may be
  unlawful. If you are not the
  intended recipient, please
  notify the sender by replying
  to this message and then
  delete it from your system.
  Thank you.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy