RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms" - UPDATE!!!

[Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>]

I think such a subgroup could be "unoffial" e.g. in the way that Kathy Kleiman 
went ahead and developed a matrix and submitted it to us. Any one of us, or a 
small cluster, could do what you propose here:

> -----Original Message-----
> 
> My vote is for a sub-group to work on it first because I am afraid that
> each email that goes out discussing a topic will be subject to 50+
> editors and snipers, advocates, detractors....... and we will end up
> nowhere. I assume that the co-chairs are the ones to make the final
> decision, but as the proposer of this idea, my vote is for the sub-group
> and then bring it to the main WG for review after each iteration of the
> document, not waiting for a final edition to send for review. FYI - I
> believe there about 10-12 people who asked to be on this sub-group so
> far, so it will be well represented.
>