RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms" - UPDATE!!!

["Hammock, Statton" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff,

I prefer your subgroup approach. There will be less "list chatter" to distract 
the group from doing the harms analysis efficiently.  

Statton 



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jeff Eckhaus
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 12:17 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Group on documenting "harms" - UPDATE!!!


Looks like the harms group that I suggested has generated a little bit of 
traffic and interest in the last 24 hours. Either people really want to work on 
this topic or they have really missed the email banter after a few days of 
quiet.

Based on the interest on the list and the emails I have received off-list I 
would think that this should be kept on the main list, but I do have a question 
for this group. Does the WG think we can work on a document that explores the 
harms and probability, possibility, likelihood, chance........ if it goes 
through the whole list for each iteration, or is it better for a sub-group to 
work on it and then put it to the WG for everyone to attack it and take it 
apart as is the custom?

My vote is for a sub-group to work on it first because I am afraid that each 
email that goes out discussing a topic will be subject to 50+ editors and 
snipers, advocates, detractors....... and we will end up nowhere. I assume that 
the co-chairs are the ones to make the final decision, but as the proposer of 
this idea, my vote is for the sub-group and then bring it to the main WG for 
review after each iteration of the document, not waiting for a final edition to 
send for review. FYI - I believe there about 10-12 people who asked to be on 
this sub-group so far, so it will be well represented.

Can the group please respond to thoughts on my proposed path forward as we have 
limited time left and a lot of work to do. Once we have some sort of idea on 
how to proceed Mikey and Roberto I believe can make the official call.



Thanks,

Jeff Eckhaus








Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.