RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms Project Draft

[Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Avri

I am in total agreement with you, please put down what you believe may happen, 
think or even dream could happen. All I was stating and believe you agreed is 
that it should be explained. Not just listed as bullet points.

I have also been thinking we should add, if you list a harm and explain how VI 
helps or exacerbates  it, please also explain how the harm is less likely or 
won't occur without VI.


Jeff Eckhaus


________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Avri Doria [avri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 8:01 PM
To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms Project Draft

On 1 Aug 2010, at 22:46, Jeff Eckhaus wrote:

> The only thing I think we should be careful is just throwing out harms and 
> not explaining how VI or CO would cause these.


while I agree in principle with this, I would note that if one feels that Vi/CO 
could exacerbate the harm or make it more likely, that is worth explaining as 
well.

yes i take note that some in the group believe we can have no knowledge of the 
likelihood of an even in the future, however, if an individual in the group 
believes they have an idea on likelihood and especially relative likelihood, it 
might be worth taking the chance and mentioning it in any case.

a.



Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.