Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms Project Draft

[Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

" ... fix the harms instead of promoting an artificial limitation ..."

To my reading that is still advocacy. Try stating correctly, in so far
as the limited expertise, and time allow, the harms, and stating also,
as correctly, with these same limits, the remediation choices, if any,
and then arguing the merits of advocacy goals.

"Actually, If you want to make these points, you are free to do so ..."

I believe it is evident that I pointed out collusion in auction as a harm
to Jeff, and market power as a circumstance. They'd both be in his "harms"
document if he didn't have other preferences, so the freedom to do so is
with little consequence.

Eric