[gnso-vi-feb10] Mischaracterizing VI/CO positions - so you don't have to

[Antony Van Couvering <avc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was amused to see Eric BW slagging off the Free Trade Proposal (and Milton) 
to the technical community 
(http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/128559):

A few highlights: 

-- Those who support the free trade position are "free trade ideologues."  (As 
opposed to the others, who seek only by their selfless efforts to improve the 
well-being of consumers...)

-- "He [Milton] errors [sic] in particular in characterizing the Free Trade 
position as without limitations. There are limitations, one of which is the 
rejection of "harms" and compliance as a necessity."  (Really?  News to me... 
Although, stricto sensu, I do reject harms as a necessity, as we could get 
along very well without any harms.)

What syntax!  What fun!

Antony