Re: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms Project Draft - Registrant Harms

[Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>]

I respect what you're saying.

I still remain convinced though, that assessing via poll would allow us to
focus due alacrity at those measured as likely and probabable that are large
harms.... and to understand those that are edge cases or deeply unlikely
which lay on the other end of the spectrum.

In plain talk we could gauge where we are pole vaulting over rat droppings.
And not.

jothan frakes

On Aug 11, 2010 7:40 PM, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I was 100% opposed to this notion when it was first raised and remain 100%
opposed to this notion now.  It is irrelevant in my mind how likely people
in this group believe a harm is to occur.  As the people in this group are
generally not the ones likely to commit one of these harms (At least I
believe), how are we to "guess" as to how likely something will occur.  The
more appropriate conversations we should be having is recognizing the harms
and figuring out ways (if at all) to prevent the harms.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@icann....

Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms Project Draft - Registrant Harms


hi,

I stil thank that getting...