RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Don't we also need to continue to work on the items in the Initial Report as 
well?  Namely, (a) responding to the public comments, (b) working on the 
definitions of SRSU, etc.  There are many other ones, but these are the first 2 
that popped into my head.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Volker Greimann
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 2:41 PM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms

Roberto,

this list is work in progress, even more so than our initial report, because we 
have actually talked about the points in the report. The list of harms is 
worthless without annotations, arguments and accompanying discussions.

If we released as is, readers would always take it as a result, not as a 
launching pad for discussions, no matter how much we state that it is just a 
basis for discussion, not a result.


I would recommend that, even if we do not compile the list of harms into this 
report, we do not stop working on it.
As some have said during the call and in the chat, the Board retreat is not the 
end of the story.
R.
Volker