RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms

["Roberto Gaetano" <roberto@xxxxxxxxx>]

To Jeff:
Indeed. There are many items we need to work on.
I am just saying that the harms item is part of this list.
 
To Volker:
I think we agree. I am not proposing to send the list as is, but to continue
working on it. I thought it was already decided not to include it in hte
interim report.
The work includes, for instance, discussing it and define charateristics of
each harm (including, if we decide so, likelyhood and level of harm).
 
Cheers,
Roberto
 


  _____  

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Monday, 16 August 2010 20:49
To: Volker Greimann; Roberto Gaetano
Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms



Don't we also need to continue to work on the items in the Initial Report as
well?  Namely, (a) responding to the public comments, (b) working on the
definitions of SRSU, etc.  There are many other ones, but these are the
first 2 that popped into my head.  

 

Jeffrey J. Neuman 
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy




  _____  


The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
delete the original message.

 

 

From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Volker Greimann
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 2:41 PM
To: Roberto Gaetano
Cc: gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Harms

 

Roberto,

this list is work in progress, even more so than our initial report, because
we have actually talked about the points in the report. The list of harms is
worthless without annotations, arguments and accompanying discussions. 

If we released as is, readers would always take it as a result, not as a
launching pad for discussions, no matter how much we state that it is just a
basis for discussion, not a result. 



I would recommend that, even if we do not compile the list of harms into
this report, we do not stop working on it. 
As some have said during the call and in the chat, the Board retreat is not
the end of the story. 
R. 

Volker