Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

["Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

close of business Wednesday...  a bit of a challenge.  :-)

Avri, i'm game to try your idea.  

what say the rest of you?  it looks like our choice is between working very 
hard to see if we can find a consensus position over the next 72 hours, or 
leave the decision with the Board.  my schedule is quite open over the next few 
days, so i'm willing to put a LOT of drafting/support/helping-out time into 
this if the rest of you think it's worth the effort.

here's what comes to mind when i think about what we've got to work with:

-- the principles (some gTLDs may be unnecessarily impacted, need for an 
exceptions process, SRSU needs to be explored, need for enhanced compliance) -- 
could we hammer on the drafts in Annex A to arrive at consensus versions?

-- the proposals -- we're about evenly divided in thirds between JN2, Free 
Trade and RACK+, is there a way to consolidate them into something that can be 
described as rough consensus?

-- the process -- maybe we can borrow some process ideas from the MaPO group to 
move ourselves quickly forward?

clearly this will be a topic for the call tomorrow, but i'd love to hear your 
thoughts on the list before then. 

mikey


On Sep 26, 2010, at 6:33 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> 
> hi,
> 
> Which I would like to point out is 3 days hence.
> 
> How about 3 hours of meeting each of the next 3 days to see if we can hammer 
> out a consensus on something?
> Following the MaPO CWG example, it might be possible, as long as we all have 
> the same spirit the members of that group had.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 26 Sep 2010, at 19:27, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Realizing that the Council meeting is on 7 October and that the GNSO 
>> Operating Procedures require 8-days advance notice for agenda items, I would 
>> like to request that the VI PDP WG send to the Council a notice of one of 
>> the two options not later than 29 September.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-
>>> feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jothan Frakes
>>> Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2010 6:11 PM
>>> To: Mike O'Connor; vertical integration wg
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Looks like October 8 is our 'horizon'.
>>> 
>>> Also liked seeing 1000 per year and San Francisco as the location of
>>> the March meeting.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> this just in, from Norway...
>>>> 
>>>> 2.11 Vertical Integration
>>>> 
>>>> The Board will send a letter to the GNSO requesting that the GNSO
>>> send to
>>>> the Board, by no later than 8 October 2010, a letter (a) indicating
>>> that no
>>>> consensus on vertical integration issues has been reached to date, or
>>> (b)
>>>> indicating its documented consensus position. If no response is
>>> received by
>>>> 8 October 2010, then the Board will deem lack of consensus and make
>>>> determinations around these issues as necessary. At the time a policy
>>>> conclusion is reached by the GNSO, it can be included in the
>>> applicant
>>>> guidebook for future application rounds.
>>>> 
>>>> - - - - - - - - -
>>>> phone  651-647-6109
>>>> fax   866-280-2356
>>>> web  http://www.haven2.com
>>>> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
>>> Google,
>>>> etc.)
>>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

- - - - - - - - -
phone   651-647-6109  
fax             866-280-2356  
web     http://www.haven2.com
handle  OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)