<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- To: vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:34:47 -0400
On 26 Sep 2010, at 21:10, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> -- the proposals -- we're about evenly divided in thirds between JN2, Free
> Trade and RACK+, is there a way to consolidate them into something that can
> be described as rough consensus?
We might also want to think about this in light of what the GAC said in their
letter to the Board as quoted by Eric:
> Begin quote:
>
> Registry-registrar separation
>
> The GAC notes the significant work being done within the ICANN community to
> resolve the difficult issue of registry-registrar separation. The GAC looks
> forward to further discussion of this important issue.
>
> The GAC notes that CANN has incorporated strict rules in version 4 of the DAG
> under which registrars are not able to provide registry services or to
> operate a new gTLD. Governments generally support restrictions on vertical
> integration and cross-ownership as important devices for promoting
> competition, preventing market dominance and averting market distortions. The
> GAC notes in this regard the Salop
> and Wright report and recognizes that vertical separation may be warranted
> where a market participant wields, or may in the future wield, market power.
>
> However, the GAC also recognises that if market power is not an issue, the
> ability of registrars with valuable technical, commercial and relevant local
> expertise and experience to enter the domain names market could likely lead
> to benefits in terms of enhancing competition and promoting innovation.
>
> An important additional benefit which the GAC expects would flow from such an
> exemption would be that community-based TLD applicants would be able to cast
> their net more widely in securing partners with the necessary expertise and
> experience in the local market to undertake what would be relatively small
> scale registry functions.
>
> The GAC therefore urges ICANN to resolve the current debate about
> registry-registrar separation with a solution that fosters competition and
> innovation in the DNS market by allowing exemptions, subject to some form of
> regulatory probity that ensures a
> level playing field, for certain registrars as potentially valuable newcomers
> to the registry market. ICANN may find it useful to consider the experience
> of competition regulators around the world in addressing this issue.
>
> End quote.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|