ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

  • To: "'ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
  • From: Jeff Eckhaus <eckhaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:53:21 -0700

Even though I disagree with Eric that the RACK proposal  comes close to the GAC 
suggestion since it shuts out Registrars except for allowing for a nominal 
minority investment  , I think he has a point in looking at the different 
proposals and analyzing  how they fit into the GAC model.

Do people think this is worth doing in our frenzied rush to the end?


----- Original Message -----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx <owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Hammock, Statton <shammock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>; Avri Doria 
<avri@xxxxxxx>; vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Mon Sep 27 05:42:10 2010
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration


The same claim could be made for RACK+. This isn't the time or place
for more of the my-proposal-is-better-than-yours-is rhetoric.


Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include 
privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Demand Media, Inc. 
Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended 
recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
then delete it from your system. Thank you.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy