ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration

  • To: vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:03:00 -0400


On 27 Sep 2010, at 08:42, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> Statton,
> 
> The same claim could be made for RACK+. This isn't the time or place for more 
> of the my-proposal-is-better-than-yours-is rhetoric.
> 
> Eric


yeah, it was all i could do in my first note (but now i will get the plug in) 
to refrain fro saying that CAM was the closest in that it included the 
regulatory element and a specific check for market power

but Eric is right (and you all know how easily that phrase comes to my 
fingers).  

this should _not_ be a pick mine moment.

a.





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy