<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- To: vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board resolution on Vertical Integration
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:03:00 -0400
On 27 Sep 2010, at 08:42, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
> Statton,
>
> The same claim could be made for RACK+. This isn't the time or place for more
> of the my-proposal-is-better-than-yours-is rhetoric.
>
> Eric
yeah, it was all i could do in my first note (but now i will get the plug in)
to refrain fro saying that CAM was the closest in that it included the
regulatory element and a specific check for market power
but Eric is right (and you all know how easily that phrase comes to my
fingers).
this should _not_ be a pick mine moment.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|