Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours

[Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mikey:

I would suggest changing the 2nd bullet from:

"There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or full vertical 
separation"

to:

"There is no consensus on either full vertical integration, complete vertical 
separation, or any hybrid proposal to date"

Thanks.

Jon

On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> 
> hi all,
> 
> this is the revised version of the bullet-points that Roberto proposed to the 
> list -- thanks to all who contributed during our call.  we'd like to leave 
> them open for comments over the next 24 hours, and then forward them to the 
> Board in anticipation of their meeting this Thursday.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> 
> •     Compliance is key (the working group spent a considerable amount of 
> time discussing the issue).  Whatever the rules established for the new TLDs, 
> we need adequate leadership, processes and resources in place to enforce them;
> •     There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or full 
> vertical separation;
> •     We have compiled a list of potential harms that may be associated with 
> either complete separation or complete integration. We have not finalized the 
> list, we have not focused on potential harms associated with partial 
> integration or separation, and we do not have consensus on the list we do 
> have.
> •     While the WG has not identified exact examples (although some cases 
> like cultural TLDs or brand TLDs have been discussed), there is a general 
> feeling that some exceptions could be granted.
> 
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, 
> Google, etc.)
> 
>