<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours
- To: vertical integration wg <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:33:58 -0500
hi all,
this is the revised version of the bullet-points that Roberto proposed to the
list -- thanks to all who contributed during our call. we'd like to leave them
open for comments over the next 24 hours, and then forward them to the Board in
anticipation of their meeting this Thursday.
thanks,
mikey
• Compliance is key (the working group spent a considerable amount of
time discussing the issue). Whatever the rules established for the new TLDs,
we need adequate leadership, processes and resources in place to enforce them;
• There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or full
vertical separation;
• We have compiled a list of potential harms that may be associated with
either complete separation or complete integration. We have not finalized the
list, we have not focused on potential harms associated with partial
integration or separation, and we do not have consensus on the list we do have.
• While the WG has not identified exact examples (although some cases
like cultural TLDs or brand TLDs have been discussed), there is a general
feeling that some exceptions could be granted.
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|