ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours

  • To: "Jon Nevett" <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours
  • From: "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:56:45 -0400

I agree with Jon, that's a more accurate statement. Editorially, I'd
remove the word "either" from Jon's language.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Nevett
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:47 PM
To: Mike O'Connor
Cc: vertical integration wg
Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points
-- pls review/comment within 24 hours


Mikey:

I would suggest changing the 2nd bullet from:

"There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or full
vertical separation"

to:

"There is no consensus on either full vertical integration, complete
vertical separation, or any hybrid proposal to date"

Thanks.

Jon

On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:

> 
> hi all,
> 
> this is the revised version of the bullet-points that Roberto proposed
to the list -- thanks to all who contributed during our call.  we'd like
to leave them open for comments over the next 24 hours, and then forward
them to the Board in anticipation of their meeting this Thursday.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> 
> *     Compliance is key (the working group spent a considerable amount
of time discussing the issue).  Whatever the rules established for the
new TLDs, we need adequate leadership, processes and resources in place
to enforce them;
> *     There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or
full vertical separation;
> *     We have compiled a list of potential harms that may be
associated with either complete separation or complete integration. We
have not finalized the list, we have not focused on potential harms
associated with partial integration or separation, and we do not have
consensus on the list we do have.
> *     While the WG has not identified exact examples (although some
cases like cultural TLDs or brand TLDs have been discussed), there is a
general feeling that some exceptions could be granted.
> 
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone         651-647-6109  
> fax           866-280-2356  
> web   http://www.haven2.com
> handle        OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
Google, etc.)
> 
> 






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy