Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points -- pls review/comment within 24 hours

[Jon Nevett <jon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Agreed -- good catch.  


On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Drazek, Keith wrote:

> I agree with Jon, that's a more accurate statement. Editorially, I'd
> remove the word "either" from Jon's language.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Nevett
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:47 PM
> To: Mike O'Connor
> Cc: vertical integration wg
> Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] refined version of Roberto's bullet-points
> -- pls review/comment within 24 hours
> 
> 
> Mikey:
> 
> I would suggest changing the 2nd bullet from:
> 
> "There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or full
> vertical separation"
> 
> to:
> 
> "There is no consensus on either full vertical integration, complete
> vertical separation, or any hybrid proposal to date"
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Jon
> 
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 2:33 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> 
>> 
>> hi all,
>> 
>> this is the revised version of the bullet-points that Roberto proposed
> to the list -- thanks to all who contributed during our call.  we'd like
> to leave them open for comments over the next 24 hours, and then forward
> them to the Board in anticipation of their meeting this Thursday.
>> 
>> thanks,
>> 
>> mikey
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> *    Compliance is key (the working group spent a considerable amount
> of time discussing the issue).  Whatever the rules established for the
> new TLDs, we need adequate leadership, processes and resources in place
> to enforce them;
>> *    There is no consensus on either full vertical integration or
> full vertical separation;
>> *    We have compiled a list of potential harms that may be
> associated with either complete separation or complete integration. We
> have not finalized the list, we have not focused on potential harms
> associated with partial integration or separation, and we do not have
> consensus on the list we do have.
>> *    While the WG has not identified exact examples (although some
> cases like cultural TLDs or brand TLDs have been discussed), there is a
> general feeling that some exceptions could be granted.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> - - - - - - - - -
>> phone        651-647-6109  
>> fax                  866-280-2356  
>> web  http://www.haven2.com
>> handle       OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook,
> Google, etc.)
>> 
>> 
> 
>