ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-vi-feb10]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20

  • To: tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20
  • From: Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 00:38:25 +0530

Have we completed our work on harms?

Sivasubramanian M



On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Thomas Barrett - EnCirca <
tbarrett@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> One area that that this WG can help inform ICANN is a uniform code of
> conduct for registries.
>
> Perhaps this WG has run out of gas.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
> Thomas Barrett
> EnCirca - President
> 400 W. Cummings Park, Suite 1725
> Woburn, MA 01801 USA
> +1.781.942.9975 ext: 11
> +1.781.823.8911 (fax)
> +1.781.492.1315 (cell)
> My Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomasbarrett
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 1:22 PM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx; 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20
>
>
> I agree that there is nothing else this WG should do, and it should be
> disbanded.  Curious to know if there are any different views in the WG or
> on
> Council.
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:40 AM
> To: Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On seing this resolution by the Board, I am not sure what more the VI WG
> could do.  The Board  seem to have chosen from the VI WG smorgasbord quite
> well.  And someday, if we see abuses, the GNSO can open a new PDP.
>
> a.
>
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-05nov10-en.htm
>
> Resolved, (2010.11.05.02), the Board directs the CEO to include the
> following principles relating to registry-registrar cross-ownership in the
> forthcoming version of the Applicant Guidebook.
>
>        . ICANN will not restrict cross-ownership between registries and
> registrars. Registry operators are defined as the registry operator and all
> other relevant parties relating to the registry services.
>
>        . Registry agreements will include requirements and restrictions on
> any inappropriate or abusive conduct arising out of registry-registrar
> cross
> ownership, including without limitations provisions protecting against:
>
>                . misuse of data; or
>
>                . violations of a registry code of conduct;
>
>        . These provisions may be enhanced by additional enforcement
> mechanisms such as the use of self-auditing requirements, and the use of
> graduated sanctions up to and including contractual termination and
> punitive
> damages.
>
>        . ICANN will permit existing registry operators to transition to the
> new form of registry agreement, except that additional conditions may be
> necessary and appropriate to address particular circumstances of
> established
> registries.
>
>        . ICANN will have the ability to refer issues to relevant
> competition authorities.
>
>        . ICANN will have the ability to address possible abuses that may
> arise out of registry-registrar cross-ownership through the consensus
> policy
> process.
>
>
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>