ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20

  • To: "icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20
  • From: Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:41:32 -0500

Agree. We should disband. And agree with Palage that it certainly has been one 
of the more interesting WGs. Like Michael, while pleased with the result I have 
nagging concerns about the long-term procedural implications of the board 
making policy without a recommendation from a WG, even when it has made the 
right decision and even when it is obvious that vested economic interests can 
block consensus in a WG. This is not criticism of the board just pondering 
ICANN's policy making methods...
Happy to see one less list to monitor. And happy to see that Erik BW is being a 
good sport! 


>I agree that there is nothing else this WG should do, and it should be
>disbanded.  Curious to know if there are any different views in the WG or on

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy