Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20
- To: "Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-vi-feb10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-vi-feb10] Board Resolution 2010.11.05.20
- From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:55:35 -0800
I would also support us sun-setting this group.
.nxt - http://dot-nxt.com New TLD conference in San Francisco,
February 9-10, 2011
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Agree. We should disband. And agree with Palage that it certainly has been
> one of the more interesting WGs. Like Michael, while pleased with the result
> I have nagging concerns about the long-term procedural implications of the
> board making policy without a recommendation from a WG, even when it has made
> the right decision and even when it is obvious that vested economic interests
> can block consensus in a WG. This is not criticism of the board just
> pondering ICANN's policy making methods...
> Happy to see one less list to monitor. And happy to see that Erik BW is being
> a good sport!
>>I agree that there is nothing else this WG should do, and it should be
>>disbanded. Curious to know if there are any different views in the WG or on