RE: [gnso-whois-dt] Updated draft "working defintions" for WHOIS and cross-references to study hypotheses attached

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As Liz requests below, please forward this to your respective groups for
comments by 16 January if possible so that we will all be prepared to
discuss it in our next meeting on 21 January.  If you already forwarded
the previous version, encourage people to replace it with these
documents because a few changes have been made as Liz describes in her
message.
 
Thanks, Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
        Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 6:55 PM
        To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] Updated draft "working defintions" for
WHOIS and cross-references to study hypotheses attached
        
        

        All,

         

        Attached please find two documents, as follows:  

         

        1.       Highlighted chart of WHOIS hypotheses:  I highlighted
each instance in our chart of study hypotheses where the terms we are
defining are actually used, so that you can see the context in which
each term is being applied.  The chart is simply a cut-and-paste from
the final hypotheses list in our 26 August WHOIS hypotheses report.

        2.       Updated list of working definitions. Please note that I
have updated this since my previous email in two respects.  First, I
have added the study numbers where the terms are used so you can
hopefully more easily find them and read them in context.  Second, I
want to highlight comments that I've added in-line for two of the terms:
"undesirable content" which I think should be changed to "illegal or
undesirable activities"  and "adequate protective measures", which is
alternately referred to in various hypotheses as "(roughly) effective
technical measures", "effective methods" and "adequate corrective
measures".  In my comments I suggest a new, streamlined definition for
"illegal or undesirable activities" which can be discussed further on
the list and at the next meeting. 

         

        Please encourage input from your constituencies and ACs.  These
revised documents, along with explanation, will also be forward to the
liaison/constituency lists as well.

         

        Please let me know if you have any questions.  

         

        Thanks, Liz