RE: [gnso-whois-dt] Whois Study DT 4 Feb 09 meeting notes
There has been very little response to this message on the list so I am
going to ask Glen, via this message, to schedule a DT call for
Wednesday, 18 Feb at 18:00 UTC (1 pm EST) to wrap this up. Here is what
we need to try to reach consensus on:
1.
Is everyone on the DT ok with the edits made in our call on 4
February to the hypotheses for Studies 3 & 20 in Group E? In our
meeting on 4 February, representatives from the following groups
approved the edits: BC, ISCPC, NCUC, RyC and NomCom. So we need
responses from the following DT members: Steve Metalitz or Lee Eulgin;
Tim Ruiz; and Alan Greenberg, (The notes from the 4 Feb meeting are
highlighted in the 1st attached file.)
2.
Is everyone on the DT ok with the latest version of the motion?
We need responses from a representative from every group on the DT.
(The revised motion with proposed changes highlighted in the 2nd
attached file.)
If we reach consensus from all DT groups on the two above (interrelated)
items on the list, we will cancel the call on the 18th, so please
respond indicating whether you are ok with both of them, and if not
communicate your concerns. We really should send the final motion to
the Council before their 19 Feb meeting.
Two other items that I will add to the agenda for 18 Feb if we have the
meeting are:
*
Edits to Whois Study Term definitions suggested by Tim Ruiz
*
ALAC input to the Whois Study priorities.
If we do not have the call on the 18th, we will schedule a call for 25
Feb to deal with them.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:28 PM
To: gnso-whois-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-dt] Whois Study DT 4 Feb 09 meeting notes
Importance: High
Meeting notes for today's Whois Study DT are attached. Note
that several edits were made to the hypotheses for Studies 3 and 20 in
Group E. Please review those and comment on the list whether you are
okay with them or have concerns. Our goal is to finalize the edits and
hence the full motion by end of this week and send the revised motion to
the Council list for distribution the all GNSO participants.
Steve Metalitz - Because I believe you were the author of Study
20, your review and comment is particularly critical. Note that the
author of Study 3, Steve DelBianco was on the call so he participated
actively in the edits for hypothesis 3.
Thanks, Chuck
Attachment:
Whois Study Drafting Team - Meeting Notes 4 Feb 09.doc Attachment:
Whois Studies - GNSO Council motion to pursue cost estimates revised 4 Feb 2009.doc
|