[gnso-whois-study] RE: Whois Hypotheses Group Meeting Recap for 29 July

[Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck.  All make sense to me and I will do tomorrow in the wiki version, 
hearing no objections.  Liz

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 1:59 PM
To: Liz Gasster; gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Whois Hypotheses Group Meeting Recap for 29 July

Thanks Liz.

I have a few suggestions/questions:

 1.  In the first row of the table, I think it would be better to move the 
column heading "Hypothesis" so that it follows the preferatory remarks and 
change it to "Hypotheses".
 2.  I also would suggest rewording the parenthetical statement something like 
this, without the parentheses: "Note: throughout this document the term 
"registrant" refers to what is sometimes called 'the actual registrant' or 
customer of the proxy/privacy service. In that regard, note the following from 
the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA):"
 3.  In case we distribute the table as a Word document, I think it would be 
helpful to format the rows so they do not break across a page; to do this, 
select all rows, then click on Table followed by Table Properties followed by 
Rows and then uncheck the box titled 'Allow row to break across pages'.
 4.  For Area 5, GAC #1, what is the "OR" for?  It looks fine in the Wiki so 
you probably don't need to do anything in the tracked Word version.
 5.  For Study 20 in Area 6, I suggest changing "Consolidated with study 
suggestion #3." to something like this: "Suggest that this be consolidated with 
study #3."
I hope others were comment if they disagree with any of my suggested edits.

Chuck

________________________________
From: Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:33 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Whois Hypotheses Group Meeting Recap for 29 July
All,

Attached please find summary of changes made on today's call for hypotheses in 
Areas 5 and 6.  They have also been updated on the wiki.  Please let me know if 
I've missed anything.  I inserted the notation about the definition of 
"registrant data" and the recap of the text of Sec. 3.7.7.3 of the RAA at the 
top of the chart just under the Hypothesis header.  The wiki doesn't like 
footnotes.

Thanks, Liz

From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:18 AM
To: gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-study] Whois Hypotheses Group Meeting Recap for 29 July

Attached and pasted below is the meeting recap for today's call.

Chuck


Meeting Recap for Whois Hypotheses Group

29 July 2008

15:00 UTC [08:00 PDT (California), 10:00 CDT (Cedar Rapids), 11:00 EDT 
Washington DC), 16:00 BST (London), 17:00 CEST (Brussels)]

Note:  The meeting was recorded and the MP3 will be available shortly.

References:

Wiki:  https://st.icann.org/whois-hypoth-wg/index.cgi?whois_hypotheses_wg

Summary of public suggestions: 
https://st.icann.org/data/workspaces/whois-hypoth-wg/attachments/whois_hypotheses_wg:20080709221045-0-19696/files/WHOIS-study-suggestion-reportwith%20GAC%20%202008%20original%20hypotheses%208%20July.doc

1.      Welcome
2.      Roll call (Glen)
3.      Agenda approval

4.      No additional comments were provided on the following from the 22 July 
meeting:

a.       The rest of Area 2 - Compliance with data protection laws and 
Registrar Accreditation Agreement (#23, #24, #12, #13, #14)

b.      Area 3 -Availability of privacy services (#2, #5, #7, #8)

c.       Area 4 - Demand and motivation for use of privacy services (#17, #18, 
#19, #9, #10)

5.      Hypotheses were developed for the following and are open for discussion 
up until and including our next meeting on 5 August:
a.       Area 5: Impact of WHOIS data protection on crime and abuse (#6, #13, 
#11, #1, #2)
b.       Area 6: Proxy registrar compliance with law enforcement and dispute 
resolution requests (#3, #20, Metalitz comment, #12)

6.      Continuing Development of hypotheses
a.        Area 7: Whois data accuracy (#8, # 11)

b.      Area 8: Other GAC recommendations (GAC #1, GAC #5, GAC #6, GAC #3)

7.      Next meeting:  Tuesday, 5 August 2008, 15:00 UTC

8.      Action items

a.       Chuck: Prepare and meeting recap NLT 30 July

b.      Liz: Prepare and distribute list of completed hypotheses NLT 30 July

c.       All:

1.      Review hypotheses developed for Areas 5 & 6 and provide comments on the 
list before the next meeting on 5 August

2.      Review and be prepared to discuss proposed hypotheses for Areas 7 & 8 
in the next meeting on 5 August.