ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached

  • To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Liz Gasster'" <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:53:12 +0200



Although I participated in the WG just before you got so heavily involved
(the two events are not linked I hasten to add J), I have not been able to
devote much active time to it recently.


However, that has not stopped me from following events and the rather
considerable amount of work that the members you have starred in your
document have put in.


I don’t have a problem with members of the group who have been very active
in recent weeks being singled out in this way. I’m not sure what this will
achieve, but I have no problem with it.



Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager

+33 1 48 01 86 17


INDOM – Noms de domaine / Domain names
124-126, rue de Provence
75008 Paris. France
0820 77 7000
(Prix d'un appel local) 
De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
 <http://www.indom.com/> www.indom.com


Daily domain name industry news:  <http://www.domaines.info/>

Mon blog/My blog :  <http://www.domaines.info/> www.stephanevangelder.com




From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: mardi 26 août 2008 21:40
To: Liz Gasster; gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached
Importance: High


I made what I think are minor edits and formatting changes that are
highlighted in the attached file.  One change I made that is not minor has
to do with the group membership list: I marked key participants with an
asterisk because there were a large number of volunteers who did not
participate at all or who participated very little.  Please let me know if
you disagree with this and also if there is anyone else who should have an





From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:04 PM
To: gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached

All, please review and let me know ASAP if I’ve missed anything or if I
should amplify on anything.  


Thanks, Liz

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy