RE: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached
Thanks Stephane. My intent was simply to give some recognition to the considerable work that some members contributed because I was extremely impressed and pleased at how much they did. Chuck _____ From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 3:53 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Liz Gasster'; gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached Chuck, Although I participated in the WG just before you got so heavily involved (the two events are not linked I hasten to add J), I have not been able to devote much active time to it recently. However, that has not stopped me from following events and the rather considerable amount of work that the members you have starred in your document have put in. I don?t have a problem with members of the group who have been very active in recent weeks being singled out in this way. I?m not sure what this will achieve, but I have no problem with it. Stéphane Van Gelder Directeur Général / General manager +33 1 48 01 86 17 INDOM ? Noms de domaine / Domain names 124-126, rue de Provence 75008 Paris. France 0820 77 7000 (Prix d'un appel local) De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67 <http://www.indom.com/> www.indom.com Daily domain name industry news: <http://www.domaines.info/> www.domaines.info Mon blog/My blog : <http://www.domaines.info/> www.stephanevangelder.com From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck Sent: mardi 26 août 2008 21:40 To: Liz Gasster; gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached Importance: High I made what I think are minor edits and formatting changes that are highlighted in the attached file. One change I made that is not minor has to do with the group membership list: I marked key participants with an asterisk because there were a large number of volunteers who did not participate at all or who participated very little. Please let me know if you disagree with this and also if there is anyone else who should have an asterisk. Chuck _____ From: owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:04 PM To: gnso-whois-study@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-whois-study] Draft hypotheses report attached All, please review and let me know ASAP if I?ve missed anything or if I should amplify on anything. Thanks, Liz Attachment:
smime.p7s
|