Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 1 Completed

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ken, Regards.
Olga

2009/12/4 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Work Prioritization Model DT:
>
>
>
> During today’s teleconference (3 Dec 2009), the Work Team completed *Step
> 1* as outlined in Liz’s email from 23 November.  The following table shows
> the revised list of projects (and revised abbreviations in red) that will be
> rated/ranked and ultimately prioritized.
>
>
>
> *Active Project List*
>
>
>
> *Seq No.*
>
> *Name*
>
> *Abbreviation*
>
> 1
>
> New gTLDs-Special Trademark Issues
>
> STI
>
> 2
>
> IDN Fast Track Implementation Plan
>
> IDNF
>
> 3
>
> Geo Regions Review Communitywide WG
>
> GEO
>
> 4
>
> Travel Policy
>
> TRA*V*
>
> 5
>
> Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery
>
> PED
>
> 6
>
> Registration Abuse Policy WG
>
> *ABUS*
>
> 7
>
> Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN WG
>
> JIG
>
> 8
>
> PPSC-PDP Work Team
>
> PDP
>
> 9
>
> PPSC-WG Work Team
>
> *WG*
>
> 10
>
> OSC-GNSO Operations Team
>
> GCO*T*
>
> 11
>
> OSC-Constituency & Stakeholder Operations Team
>
> CSG
>
> 12
>
> OSC-Communications & Coordination Work Team
>
> CCT
>
> 13
>
> IRTP – Part B PDP
>
> IRTB
>
> 14
>
> Registrar Accreditation Agreement
>
> RAA
>
> 15
>
> Internationalized Registration Data WG
>
> IRD
>
>
>
> The following projects were removed from the original list for one of three
> reasons (ref. “Category” column), but will be maintained in a separate table
> so that the team does not lose track of them:
>
>
>
> 1)      Community Inactive (“I”):  the work effort is waiting on or
> pending another action (e.g. Staff report) or decision  (e.g. Council
> motion) and is not currently consuming community resources.
>
> 2)      Monitor Only (“M”) :  the work effort is not fundamentally
> prioritized by the Council, but it does maintain an interest from an
> informational perspective (Note: also includes liaison activities).
>
> 3)      Not a GNSO Project (“X”):  the work effort is not or not yet a
> GNSO initiative and cannot be properly evaluated (ranked/rated) and
> prioritized by the Council.
>
>
>
> *Category*
>
> *Name*
>
> *Abbreviation*
>
> I
>
> WHOIS Studies
>
> WHO1
>
> I
>
> Fast Flux
>
> FF
>
> I
>
> Synthesis of WHOIS Service Requirements
>
> WHO2
>
> M
>
> GNSO Constituency Reconfirmations
>
> GCR
>
> X
>
> Registry/Registrar Vertical Integration
>
> RRVI
>
>
>
> The three category explanations above may need tweaking, but I hope I
> captured the essence of the team’s discussion accurately.
>
>
>
> To make it easier to track and respond, I will create new email threads for
> each separate task.
>
>
>
> *Congratulations on completing Step 1!*
>
>
>
> Ken Bour
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar