AW: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (Completed)
Thanks Ken and Stéphane. I agree. Wolf-Ulrich _____ Von: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 09:42 An: Ken Bour Cc: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (Completed) Thanks Ken, I would suggest just the following small wording change on the X axis definition, the idea being that having the word budget in the definition includes that notion of cost in there as one of the factors to be considered (even though you mention overall cost, I think a specific reference to budgetary considerations is important): X ? Resource Consumption ? this dimension relates to perceptions of total human capital expenditure anticipated and also includes such factors as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many moving parts to coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing interests), length of time/energy expected; availability/scarcity of resources, budget -- all of which contribute to the total resource consumption and overall cost (economic and otherwise) required to develop a recommendation. Thanks, Stéphane Le 11 déc. 2009 à 01:04, Ken Bour a écrit : Team Members: As a result of our productive conference call today, 10 December (2000 UTC), the team solidified the definitions for the X/Y axes in the two dimensional model that will be used to establish project prioritization for the GNSO. I did a bit more fine-tuning to the wording while staying consistent with the team?s consensus changes: Y ? Value/Benefit ? this dimension relates to perceptions of overall value and benefit to: 1) the global Internet community; and 2) ICANN stakeholders. Components of this dimension may include, but are not limited to: new opportunities for Internet growth/expansion, enhanced competitiveness, resolution/improvement of serious performance or infrastructure problems, increased security/stability, and improved user experience. X ? Resource Consumption ? this dimension relates to perceptions of total human capital expenditure anticipated and also includes such factors as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many moving parts to coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing interests), length of time/energy expected; availability/scarcity of resources -- all of which contribute to the total resource consumption and overall cost (economic and otherwise) required to develop a recommendation. It would be helpful to have agreement on this final wording in the next day or so since it will be used as a basis for the first WPM-DT test that will be performed in the next seven days (see separate email). I understand, from our discussion today, that Olga will formally ask for team consensus on both Step 1 and Step 2. Regards, Ken P.S. A separate email will be forthcoming regarding the Step 1 Project List consolidation (names, definitions, abbreviations) and the team?s approach for Step 3-Testing Rating Methodologies. Attachment:
smime.p7s
|