Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (Completed)

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ken and Stéphane, I also agree.
Regards
Olga

2009/12/11 <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  Thanks Ken and Stéphane. I agree.
>
>
> Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *Von:* owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] *Im
> Auftrag von *Stéphane Van Gelder
> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 11. Dezember 2009 09:42
> *An:* Ken Bour
> *Cc:* gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> *Betreff:* Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Step 2 (Completed)
>
>  Thanks Ken,
>
> I would suggest just the following small wording change on the X axis
> definition, the idea being that having the word budget in the definition
> includes that notion of cost in there as one of the factors to be considered
> (even though you mention overall cost, I think a specific reference to
> budgetary considerations is important):
>
>   *X – Resource Consumption … *this dimension relates to perceptions of
> total human capital expenditure anticipated and also includes such factors
> as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many moving parts to
> coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing interests), length of
> time/energy expected; availability/scarcity of resources, budget -- all of
> which contribute to the total resource consumption and overall cost
> (economic and otherwise) required to develop a recommendation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>  Le 11 déc. 2009 à 01:04, Ken Bour a écrit :
>
>   Team Members:
>  As a result of our productive conference call today, 10 December (2000
> UTC), the team solidified the definitions for the X/Y axes in the two
> dimensional model that will be used to establish project prioritization for
> the GNSO.
>  I did a bit more fine-tuning to the wording while staying consistent with
> the team’s consensus changes:
>  *Y – Value/Benefit … *this dimension relates to perceptions of overall
> value and benefit to:  1) the global Internet community; and 2) ICANN
> stakeholders.  Components of this dimension may include, but are not limited
> to:  new opportunities for Internet growth/expansion, enhanced
> competitiveness, resolution/improvement of serious performance or
> infrastructure problems, increased security/stability, and improved user
> experience.
>
> *X – Resource Consumption … *this dimension relates to perceptions of
> total human capital expenditure anticipated and also includes such factors
> as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many moving parts to
> coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing interests), length of
> time/energy expected; availability/scarcity of resources -- all of which
> contribute to the total resource consumption and overall cost (economic and
> otherwise) required to develop a recommendation.* *
> It would be helpful to have agreement on this final wording in the next day
> or so since it will be used as a basis for the first WPM-DT test that will
> be performed in the next seven days (see separate email).
>  I understand, from our discussion today, that Olga will formally ask for
> team consensus on both Step 1 and Step 2.
>  Regards,
>  Ken
>  P.S.  A separate email will be forthcoming regarding the Step 1 Project
> List consolidation (names, definitions, abbreviations) and the team’s
> approach for Step 3-Testing Rating Methodologies.
>
>
>


-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar