[gnso-wpm-dt] WPM-DT: Consensus on Step 1 and Step 2

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Working team members,

First let me thank Liz and Ken for an excellent work and support given to
this working team.

During our conference calls and through the exchange of ideas in our email
list, we have agreed on a project list definition (step 1) and on the x y
axis for the two dimensions model (step 2). I have copied these outcomes in
this email for facilitating your review.

It is important that we all agree in the outcome of these two steps, as they
will be the basis of the next prioritizaton excersise.

*In this sense I kindly ask those of you who could not attend the conference
calls to review the information included in this email and send a
confirmation to the email list saying that you agree with them or suggest
any changes, if needed.

Confirmations or suggested changes should be sent today, as we will start
our prioritization excersise imediately.*

Best regards and have a nice weekend.

Olga
*

Step 1:*

The following table shows the revised list of projects (and revised
abbreviations in red) that will be rated/ranked and ultimately prioritized.

*Active Project List*

*Seq No.*

*Name*

*Abbreviation*



  1

New gTLDs-Special Trademark Issues

STI



  2

IDN Fast Track Implementation Plan

IDNF

3

Geo Regions Review Communitywide WG

GEO

4

Travel Policy

TRA*V*

5

Post-Expiration Domain Name Recovery

PED

6

Registration Abuse Policy WG

*ABUS*

7

Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN WG

JIG

8

PPSC-PDP Work Team

PDP

9

PPSC-WG Work Team

*WG*

10

OSC-GNSO Operations Team

GCO*T*

11

OSC-Constituency & Stakeholder Operations Team

CSG

12

OSC-Communications & Coordination Work Team

CCT



  13

IRTP – Part B PDP

IRTB



  14

Registrar Accreditation Agreement

RAA

15

Internationalized Registration Data WG

IRD





The following projects were removed from the original list for one of three
reasons (ref. “Category” column), but will be maintained in a separate table
so that the team does not lose track of them:



1)      Community Inactive (“I”):  the work effort is waiting on or pending
another action (e.g. Staff report) or decision  (e.g. Council motion) and is
not currently consuming community resources.

2)      Monitor Only (“M”) :  the work effort is not fundamentally
prioritized by the Council, but it does maintain an interest from an
informational perspective (Note: also includes liaison activities).

3)      Not a GNSO Project (“X”):  the work effort is not or not yet a GNSO
initiative and cannot be properly evaluated (ranked/rated) and prioritized
by the Council.



*Category*

*Name*

*Abbreviation*

I

WHOIS Studies

WHO1

I

Fast Flux

FF

I

Synthesis of WHOIS Service Requirements

WHO2

M

GNSO Constituency Reconfirmations

GCR

X

Registry/Registrar Vertical Integration

RRVI



The three category explanations above may need tweaking, but I hope I
captured the essence of the team’s discussion accurately.

*Step 2:*

> The team solidified the definitions for the X/Y axes in the two dimensional
> model that will be used to establish project prioritization for the GNSO.
>
> *Y – Value/Benefit … *this dimension relates to perceptions of overall
> value and benefit to:  1) the global Internet community; and 2) ICANN
> stakeholders.  Components of this dimension may include, but are not limited
> to:  new opportunities for Internet growth/expansion, enhanced
> competitiveness, resolution/improvement of serious performance or
> infrastructure problems, increased security/stability, and improved user
> experience.
>
> *X – Resource Consumption … *this dimension relates to perceptions of
> total human capital expenditure anticipated and also includes such factors
> as complexity (e.g. technical), intricacy (e.g. many moving parts to
> coordinate), lack of cohesion (e.g. many competing interests), length of
> time/energy expected; availability/scarcity of resources -- all of which
> contribute to the total resource consumption and overall cost (economic and
> otherwise) required to develop a recommendation.*  *
>