[gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Note the question asked by Alan regarding whether or not liaisons would
participate in the prioritization exercise and note that I responded by
saying that I assumed they would and added that I thought that our
non-voting Councilor would participate as well, Andrei.  Olga confirmed
the same view.  I thought it would be a good idea to make sure everyone
on the WPM DT felt the same.  If anyone disagrees, please speak up.
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:48 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Prioritization process


No question about Andrei (in my mind). He is a full Council member (but
no vote). But I am a not-a-council-member-but-treated-like-one.  ;-)

Alan

At 29/04/2010 10:21 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:


        That would be my assumption Alan. 
        I would also assume Andrei would participate.
        
        Chuck
        
        
________________________________

        From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
        To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> 
        Sent: Thu Apr 29 15:45:52 2010
        Subject: Prioritization process 
        
        Chuck (as Council Chair) and Olga (as WPM-DT chair),
        
        I have been asked to draft a comment on the prioritization
effort on behalf of ALAC.
        
        In your minds, is it the intent that the ALAC Liaison to the
GNSO Council participate in the prioritization process?  Based on the
Bylaw definition of the Liaison as: 

                "Liaisons shall not be members of or entitled to vote,
to make or second motions, or to serve as an officer on the GNSO
Council, but otherwise liaisons shall be entitled to participate on
equal footing with members of the GNSO Council." 

        I am assuming that I or my namesake will be a full-fledged
participant.
        
        Alan