<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 12:58:10 +0200
Chuck,
I think you should be putting the question to the Council as a whole, not
restricting it to this WG.
My own take: I agree that it would be great to have both Alan and Andrei
participate in this.
Thanks,
Stéphane
Le 3 mai 2010 à 06:26, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :
> Note the question asked by Alan regarding whether or not liaisons would
> participate in the prioritization exercise and note that I responded by
> saying that I assumed they would and added that I thought that our non-voting
> Councilor would participate as well, Andrei. Olga confirmed the same view.
> I thought it would be a good idea to make sure everyone on the WPM DT felt
> the same. If anyone disagrees, please speak up.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:48 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Prioritization process
>
> No question about Andrei (in my mind). He is a full Council member (but no
> vote). But I am a not-a-council-member-but-treated-like-one. ;-)
>
> Alan
>
> At 29/04/2010 10:21 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> That would be my assumption Alan.
>> I would also assume Andrei would participate.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Thu Apr 29 15:45:52 2010
>> Subject: Prioritization process
>>
>> Chuck (as Council Chair) and Olga (as WPM-DT chair),
>>
>> I have been asked to draft a comment on the prioritization effort on behalf
>> of ALAC.
>>
>> In your minds, is it the intent that the ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council
>> participate in the prioritization process? Based on the Bylaw definition of
>> the Liaison as:
>> "Liaisons shall not be members of or entitled to vote, to make or second
>> motions, or to serve as an officer on the GNSO Council, but otherwise
>> liaisons shall be entitled to participate on equal footing with members of
>> the GNSO Council."
>> I am assuming that I or my namesake will be a full-fledged participant.
>>
>> Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|