ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 12:58:10 +0200


I think you should be putting the question to the Council as a whole, not 
restricting it to this WG.

My own take: I agree that it would be great to have both Alan and Andrei 
participate in this.



Le 3 mai 2010 à 06:26, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

> Note the question asked by Alan regarding whether or not liaisons would 
> participate in the prioritization exercise and note that I responded by 
> saying that I assumed they would and added that I thought that our non-voting 
> Councilor would participate as well, Andrei.  Olga confirmed the same view.  
> I thought it would be a good idea to make sure everyone on the WPM DT felt 
> the same.  If anyone disagrees, please speak up.
> Chuck
> From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:48 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Prioritization process
> No question about Andrei (in my mind). He is a full Council member (but no 
> vote). But I am a not-a-council-member-but-treated-like-one.  ;-)
> Alan
> At 29/04/2010 10:21 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>> That would be my assumption Alan. 
>> I would also assume Andrei would participate.
>> Chuck
>> From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
>> To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> 
>> Sent: Thu Apr 29 15:45:52 2010
>> Subject: Prioritization process 
>> Chuck (as Council Chair) and Olga (as WPM-DT chair),
>> I have been asked to draft a comment on the prioritization effort on behalf 
>> of ALAC.
>> In your minds, is it the intent that the ALAC Liaison to the GNSO Council 
>> participate in the prioritization process?  Based on the Bylaw definition of 
>> the Liaison as:
>> "Liaisons shall not be members of or entitled to vote, to make or second 
>> motions, or to serve as an officer on the GNSO Council, but otherwise 
>> liaisons shall be entitled to participate on equal footing with members of 
>> the GNSO Council."
>> I am assuming that I or my namesake will be a full-fledged participant.
>> Alan

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy