AW: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree
 


Regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

 


________________________________

        Von: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
        Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2010 06:27
        An: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
        Betreff: [gnso-wpm-dt] FW: Prioritization process
        
        
        Note the question asked by Alan regarding whether or not
liaisons would participate in the prioritization exercise and note that
I responded by saying that I assumed they would and added that I thought
that our non-voting Councilor would participate as well, Andrei.  Olga
confirmed the same view.  I thought it would be a good idea to make sure
everyone on the WPM DT felt the same.  If anyone disagrees, please speak
up.
         
        Chuck

________________________________

        From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 11:48 PM
        To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: Re: Prioritization process
        
        
        No question about Andrei (in my mind). He is a full Council
member (but no vote). But I am a
not-a-council-member-but-treated-like-one.  ;-)
        
        Alan
        
        At 29/04/2010 10:21 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
        

                That would be my assumption Alan. 
                I would also assume Andrei would participate.
                
                Chuck
                
                
________________________________

                From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> 
                To: Gomes, Chuck; olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
<olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> 
                Sent: Thu Apr 29 15:45:52 2010
                Subject: Prioritization process 
                
                Chuck (as Council Chair) and Olga (as WPM-DT chair),
                
                I have been asked to draft a comment on the
prioritization effort on behalf of ALAC.
                
                In your minds, is it the intent that the ALAC Liaison to
the GNSO Council participate in the prioritization process?  Based on
the Bylaw definition of the Liaison as: 

                        "Liaisons shall not be members of or entitled to
vote, to make or second motions, or to serve as an officer on the GNSO
Council, but otherwise liaisons shall be entitled to participate on
equal footing with members of the GNSO Council." 

                I am assuming that I or my namesake will be a
full-fledged participant.
                
                Alan