Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM: DRAFT Resolution to Approve & Publish Final WPM Ratings

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I plan to submit this motion later today.
I am ok with the text, if there are any comments please let us know.
Regards
Olga

2010/6/11 Ken Bour <ken.bour@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> WPM-DT Members:
>
> At Chuck’s request, below is a draft Council Resolution to approve Step 3
> and authorize Step 4 of the WPM timeline.   Your comments are welcome.
>
> Olga has agreed to submit this motion.   Jaime or Wolf – would be agreeable
> to second it once submitted on or before Tuesday, 15 June?
>
> Question:  should there be another 21-day community comment period for the
> final Project Value Ratings resulting from Step 3?   I note that we just
> completed a Public Comment Forum for the WPM procedures (closed 16 May).
>  One person provided relevant input which was supportive and only inquired
> as to whether Liaisons would be able to participate (answered: “Yes”).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken
> ===
>
> *GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)*
>
> WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a resolution
> and timeline<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>to 
> conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
> procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and 
> ANNEX<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf>)
> recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT);
>
> WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first
> three of which have been completed as follows:
>
> 1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
> Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project 
> List<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf>
>  (v1.0),
> including a Cover 
> Letter<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pdf>,
> on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20 May 
> 2010<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/>
> ]
>
> 2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted
> individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1)
> on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then
> successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3;
>
> 3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
> discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a
> set of Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects;
>
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
>
> RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value
> Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and
> directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according
> to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.
>