<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
- To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:23:08 -0700
What does wpm stand for?
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for
> Initiating New Projects
> From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, December 09, 2010 12:11 pm
> To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
> following our conversation last Sunday and considering the summary I
> submitted two days ago, Glen has set up the email list for our "coffee
> conversation":
>
> gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
>
>
> which includes:
>
> Stephane
> Jaime
> Wolf
> Tim
> Rosemary
> Olga
>
> Lets see how we want to move forward from now on.
>
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>
> From: Olga Cavalli
> Date: 2010/12/7
> Subject: Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
>
> To: GNSO Council
>
>
> Hi,
> this is a summary of the ideas exchanged last Saturday about Development of
> Criteria for Initiating New Projects.
>
> At the end of the session the following council members agreed to keep on
> talking about this:
>
> Stephane
> Jaime
> Wolf
> Tim
> Rosemary
> Olga
>
> Comments and other ideas are welcome.
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
> Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
>
>
> We should have one yearly strategy planning session focusing on what we
> can do with our resources.
>
> Before starting each project some key questions should be done in order to
> have a sense of general priority level.
> Why is this a priority project?
> Do we have the resources?
> Which is the main driver of the project?
>
>
>
> How do we tell that we are full?
> How
> do we tell there are no resources?
> Should we stop a pdp? This would need careful
> thought.
>
> More community resources: it is possible to recruit more people.
>
> Use of a simple model and outcomes could be complemented by recommendations
> done by council leaders.
>
> The decision should be made by the leadership of the council.
>
>
>
>
> Council should evaluate where do the new projects fit in and agree on
> some, in a case by case basis.
>
> There could be a methodology that includes points (European Parliament)
>
> There could be voting thresholds to iniciate a project.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|