RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

What does wpm stand for?

Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for
> Initiating New Projects
> From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, December 09, 2010 12:11 pm
> To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Hi, 
> following our conversation last Sunday and considering the summary I 
> submitted two days ago, Glen has set up the email list for our "coffee 
> conversation":
> 
> gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> which includes:
> 
> Stephane
> Jaime
> Wolf
> Tim
> Rosemary
> Olga
> 
> Lets see how we want to move forward from now on.
> 
> Regards
> Olga
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> 
> From: Olga Cavalli 
> Date: 2010/12/7
> Subject: Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
> 
> To: GNSO Council 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> this is a summary of the ideas exchanged last Saturday about Development of 
> Criteria for Initiating New Projects.
> 
> At the end of the session the following council members agreed to keep on 
> talking about this:
> 
> Stephane
> Jaime
> Wolf
> Tim
> Rosemary
> Olga
> 
> Comments and other ideas are welcome.
> Regards
> Olga
> 
> 
> Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
> 
> 
> We should have one yearly strategy planning session focusing on what we 
> can do with our resources.
> 
> Before starting each project some key questions should be done in order to 
> have a sense of general priority level.
> Why is this a priority project?
> Do we have the resources?
> Which is the main driver of the project?
> 
> 
> 
> How do we tell that we are full?
> How
>  do we tell there are no resources?
> Should we stop a pdp? This would need careful
>  thought.
> 
> More community resources: it is possible to recruit more people.
> 
> Use of a simple model and outcomes could be complemented by recommendations 
> done by council leaders.
> 
> The decision should be made by the leadership of the council.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Council should evaluate where do the new projects fit in and agree on 
> some, in a case by case basis.
> 
> There could be a methodology that includes points (European Parliament)
> 
> There could be voting thresholds to iniciate a project.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>