Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects

[Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Tim,
is the same email list we used for the prioritization working group but Glen
udpdated the participants and left staff in it.
Regards
Olga

2010/12/9 Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> What does wpm stand for?
>
> Tim
>
>
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for
> > Initiating New Projects
> > From: Olga Cavalli
> > Date: Thu, December 09, 2010 12:11 pm
> > To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Hi,
> > following our conversation last Sunday and considering the summary I
> submitted two days ago, Glen has set up the email list for our "coffee
> conversation":
> >
> > gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > which includes:
> >
> > Stephane
> > Jaime
> > Wolf
> > Tim
> > Rosemary
> > Olga
> >
> > Lets see how we want to move forward from now on.
> >
> > Regards
> > Olga
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >
> > From: Olga Cavalli
> > Date: 2010/12/7
> > Subject: Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
> >
> > To: GNSO Council
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> > this is a summary of the ideas exchanged last Saturday about Development
> of Criteria for Initiating New Projects.
> >
> > At the end of the session the following council members agreed to keep on
> talking about this:
> >
> > Stephane
> > Jaime
> > Wolf
> > Tim
> > Rosemary
> > Olga
> >
> > Comments and other ideas are welcome.
> > Regards
> > Olga
> >
> >
> > Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
> >
> >
> > We should have one yearly strategy planning session focusing on what we
> > can do with our resources.
> >
> > Before starting each project some key questions should be done in order
> to have a sense of general priority level.
> > Why is this a priority project?
> > Do we have the resources?
> > Which is the main driver of the project?
> >
> >
> >
> > How do we tell that we are full?
> > How
> > do we tell there are no resources?
> > Should we stop a pdp? This would need careful
> > thought.
> >
> > More community resources: it is possible to recruit more people.
> >
> > Use of a simple model and outcomes could be complemented by
> recommendations done by council leaders.
> >
> > The decision should be made by the leadership of the council.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Council should evaluate where do the new projects fit in and agree on
> > some, in a case by case basis.
> >
> > There could be a methodology that includes points (European Parliament)
> >
> > There could be voting thresholds to iniciate a project.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>