RE: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Got it. My brain isn't working at top speed today.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for
> Initiating New Projects
> From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, December 09, 2010 12:35 pm
> To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> Tim,
> is the same email list we used for the prioritization working group but Glen 
> udpdated the participants and left staff in it.
> Regards
> Olga
> 
> 2010/12/9 Tim Ruiz 
> What does wpm stand for?
> 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [gnso-wpm-dt] Email list - Development of Criteria for
> > Initiating New Projects
> 
> 
> > From: Olga Cavalli 
> > Date: Thu, December 09, 2010 12:11 pm
> > To: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > Hi, 
> > following our conversation last Sunday and considering the summary I 
> > submitted two days ago, Glen has set up the email list for our "coffee 
> > conversation":
> > 
> > gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> > 
> > 
> > which includes:
> > 
> > Stephane
> > Jaime
> > Wolf
> > Tim
> > Rosemary
> > Olga
> > 
> > Lets see how we want to move forward from now on.
> > 
> > Regards
> > Olga
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > 
> > From: Olga Cavalli 
> 
> 
> > Date: 2010/12/7
> > Subject: Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
> > 
> > To: GNSO Council 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> > this is a summary of the ideas exchanged last Saturday about Development of 
> > Criteria for Initiating New Projects.
> > 
> > At the end of the session the following council members agreed to keep on 
> > talking about this:
> > 
> > Stephane
> > Jaime
> > Wolf
> > Tim
> > Rosemary
> > Olga
> > 
> > Comments and other ideas are welcome.
> > Regards
> > Olga
> > 
> > 
> > Development of Criteria for Initiating New Projects
> > 
> > 
> > We should have one yearly strategy planning session focusing on what we 
> > can do with our resources.
> > 
> > Before starting each project some key questions should be done in order to 
> > have a sense of general priority level.
> > Why is this a priority project?
> > Do we have the resources?
> > Which is the main driver of the project?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > How do we tell that we are full?
> > How
> >  do we tell there are no resources?
> > Should we stop a pdp? This would need careful
> >  thought.
> > 
> > More community resources: it is possible to recruit more people.
> > 
> > Use of a simple model and outcomes could be complemented by recommendations 
> > done by council leaders.
> > 
> > The decision should be made by the leadership of the council.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Council should evaluate where do the new projects fit in and agree on 
> > some, in a case by case basis.
> > 
> > There could be a methodology that includes points (European Parliament)
> > 
> > There could be voting thresholds to iniciate a project.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>