<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gtld-council] FW: suggested language for recommendation 3 and 6 on new GTLDs
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gtld-council] FW: suggested language for recommendation 3 and 6 on new GTLDs
- From: Liz Williams <liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 19:59:48 +0200
yes, I meant to send this on -- good ideas all around
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 07 Jul 2007, at 15:11, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Here is what I think is a very good suggestion regarding
recommendations 3 and 6 from Becky Burr. In particular, I hope the
subgroup formed to work on recommendation 6 will consider this.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity
to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under
applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original
transmission."
From: Burr, Becky [mailto:Becky.Burr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 3:46 PM
To: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Gomes, Chuck
Subject: suggested language for recommendation 3 and 6 on new GTLDs
I spoke with several folks in Puerto Rico and it seemed to me that
there was a potential clarification for Recommendation 6 that might
address some of the concerns being expressed about how one
determined whether something was or was not a "generally accepted
concepts about morality and public order," etc. I sent this
suggestion earlier today to Liz Williams, J. Scott Evans, and Bruce
(because they are among the people I discussed this with). Liz
hasn't reacted, but J. Scott and Bruce have had positive
reactions. Bruce suggested that I send it to you, so here goes.
Why not create a defined term "Generally Accepted International
Standards" meaning:
"generally accepted legal norms, as codified in and enforceable
through public international law enjoying broad global support
including, without limitation, the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, the International Convention on the Elimination of All
Forms of Racial Discrimination, the International Covenant on
Economic, Cultural, and Social Rights, the Convention on the
Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women, the
International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, the
Convention on Rights of the Child, the Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities, and the Paris Convention for the
Protection of Intellectual Property."
and then combine recommendations 3 and 6 into a single
recommendation as follows:
"Strings must not be contrary to, or infringe the rights of others
established in, Generally Accepted International Standards."
J. Beckwith Burr
WilmerHale
1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20006 USA
+1 202 663 6695 (t)
+1 202 663 6363 (f)
becky.burr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE:
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we
inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication
(including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used,
and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under
the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed
herein.
This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us
immediately -- by replying to this message or by sending an email
to postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- and destroy all copies of this
message and any attachments. Thank you.
For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://
www.wilmerhale.com.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|