RE: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference calls 6 & 20

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As I said on Friday's call, I don't see any value in the Rec. 20 call
meeting again.  Working it on the full committee list should suffice.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Williams
> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 1:58 PM
> To: Avri Doria
> Cc: gtld-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gtld-council] Updated work schedule: conference 
> calls 6 & 20
> 
> Hello everyone
> 
> The option is open to the Rec 20 small group if they need it.
> 
> Liz
> .....................................................
> 
> Liz Williams
> Senior Policy Counselor
> ICANN - Brussels
> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 15 Jul 2007, at 19:34, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > While, as Chuck indicated in his note, there had been 
> agreement on the 
> > discussion group for #6 meeting again, there had been not been such 
> > agreement for #20.
> >
> > I see no problem with the #20 discussion group meeting if they feel 
> > there is something to be gained by doing so.  Perhaps some on list 
> > conversation will indicate whether there is any value in 
> such a call.
> >
> > thanks for setting them up.
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 15 jul 2007, at 13.23, Liz Williams wrote:
> >
> >> Hello everyone
> >>
> >> It seems that a set of conference calls to deal with outstanding 
> >> issues on recommendation 6 & 20 would be useful.  Please see 
> >> suggested times below and please refer to my previous 
> email for the 
> >> start point of those discussions.  I can co-ordinate both calls if 
> >> necessary but would ask that a member of each group report to the 
> >> Committee meeting on Thursday 19 July.
> >>
> >> Given the current work schedule of other GNSO calls, I suggest two 
> >> sequential calls on Wed 18 July
> >>
> >> Recommendation 6 small group:  15:00 UTC (08:00 LA/San Francisco, 
> >> 11:00 EDT/Washington DC, 12:00 Buenos Aires, 17:00 CEST/Brussels/ 
> >> Oslo, 01:00 Melbourne, next day.)
> >>
> >> Recommendation 20 small group:  16:30 UTC (09:30 LA/San Francisco, 
> >> 12:30 EDT/Washington DC, 13:30 Buenos Aires, 18:30 CEST/Brussels/
> >> Oslo)
> >>
> >> I hope that this will suit the majority -- it is almost 
> impossible to 
> >> schedule something that is perfect but this should suit the main 
> >> protagonists for each group.
> >>
> >> I will proceed with having the GNSO Secretariat send out 
> call details 
> >> ASAP.
> >>
> >> Kind regards.
> >>
> >> Liz
> >>
> >>
> >> .....................................................
> >>
> >> Liz Williams
> >> Senior Policy Counselor
> >> ICANN - Brussels
> >> +32 2 234 7874 tel
> >> +32 2 234 7848 fax
> >> +32 497 07 4243 mob
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
>